Aureonplay Casino currently has the highest score on our editorial list: 7.4/10. That doesn’t mean the casino is flawless — it means it publishes more things openly than the other brands we compared. The bonus wagering multiplier, bet limit, validity period and game contribution percentages are shown as numbers without logging in, and that is rarer than you might think. At the same time the casino operates under an Anjouan licence, whose number is not published on the site, and it does not disclose its owning company on the front page. These two sides run in parallel throughout this review.
We wrote this page based on materials, not atmosphere. We used the casino's own public campaign and bonus texts as collected by the editorial team in July 2026, the editorial brand list with domain details and the Trustpilot profile we read on 3.8.2026. We have not opened an account at this casino or made a test deposit, so all payout speed claims are the casino's own statements and not our measurements. In each section we state the source of the information and mark missing parts as missing instead of filling them with industry averages.
Written by Petri Halkola · Slot and casino reviews · Updated 4.8.2026 · Trustpilot checked 3.8.2026
All figures from sources — empty fields are marked as empty
↔ The table scrolls horizontally.
| Brand | Aureonplay Casino |
|---|---|
| Domain | aureonplay.com · Cloudflare-protected, .nl- and aureon-*-addresses are gateway pages |
| Owner | Not stated on the homepage — corporate details only in the terms of use |
| License | Anjouan (Comoros) · license number not published on the site |
| Founded | Not stated on the site |
| Products | Slot games, live tables, table games, the house Originals games (Chicken Road, Plinko 1000, Mines, Crash) and sports betting |
| Game count | Over 4,000 titles — casino’s own claim, we have not counted them |
| Welcome offer | 125% up to €1,000 + 75 free spins (part of a three-deposit package) |
| Wagering | 40× (bonus + free spin wins) |
| Min. deposit | 20 € |
| Withdrawal time | Casino’s stated average n. 8 min 49 s · limits and methods are not published |
| Customer support | Live chat from the front page · no other channels stated |
| Languages | English · suomenkielistä palvelua ei ole vahvistettu |
| Currency | EUR (euro-denominated player account) |
| Trustpilot | 3,2 / 5 · 1 review · profile claimed, brand responds |
The note “not published” means the information is not found on the casino’s own public pages — we do not fill it in with guesses or industry averages. These gaps are part of the result because they show what a player can verify before transferring money and what they cannot.
Both lists from the same material
The overall rating is the weighted average of these
↔ The table scrolls horizontally.
| Subarea | Scores | Weight | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Game selection | 8,5 | 20 % | Over 4,000 titles, live tables, own Originals and sports betting on the same account. |
| Bonuses and promotions | 8,0 | 15 % | Welcome bonus, daily cashback up to 20%, rakeback up to 11%, VIP program and referral program. |
| Transparency of terms | 8,0 | 15 % | Wagering 40×, stake cap €5, 7-day validity and game weightings are stated — but the bonus figures on the front page are inconsistent. |
| Payments and withdrawals | 8,2 | 25 % | Euro account and the casino’s stated sub-9-minute average payout; methods and limits are still not published. |
| Customer support | 7,5 | 10 % | Live chat is directly on the front page, but service hours, email or service languages are not stated. |
| Player feedback | 3,2 | 15 % | Trustpilot's own average as-is: 3,2/5 · 1 review. |
| Overall rating | 7,4 | 100 % | 8,5×0,20 + 8,0×0,15 + 8,0×0,15 + 8,2×0,25 + 7,5×0,10 + 3,2×0,15 = 7,4 / 10 |
The weights are fixed in advance and are the same in each of our casino reviews, so scores can be compared from one page to another. For player feedback we include the Trustpilot average as-is, without rounding it up — it is the only component whose value is not our interpretation.
What the review is based on — and what it isn’t based on
This review was written from material collected by the editorial team from the casino's own public texts. Practically there are three sources: the casino's homepage and promotions page as recorded in our archive in July 2026, the editorial team's brand and domain list that we maintain for every casino on our list, and the Trustpilot profile we read on 3.8.2026. Every number on this page can be traced to one of these three. If a number isn't available, we write "not published" instead and do not fill the gap with a guess.
We started from the domain because that decides whether we're even talking about the real site. The main domain is aureonplay.com and our list also shows aureonplaycasino.com as an alternate address. The site is behind Cloudflare protection, and our automated checks hit the protection — so we couldn't get a fresh view of the site at the time of writing the review. We also noted that some .nl addresses and addresses starting with aureon are gateway pages or promo pages that only forward traffic. For the player this is a practical warning: check the address bar character by character before logging in.
The bonus share is the most precise part of this review because the source material is unusually detailed. The welcome-bonus details include the percentage, maximum amount, number of free spins, minimum deposit, wagering multiplier, maximum stake with bonus funds, validity period and which games count 100% towards wagering. It’s rare to have so many numbers from one offer on our list. We also noted what isn’t disclosed: the percentages for the second and third deposit in the package, how cashback is calculated, rakeback accrual rules and the friend-referral reward amount.
Then we encountered a contradiction we cannot explain away. The campaign page shows 125% up to €1 000 and 75 free spins, but the front page presents the same welcome offer as 225% up to €1 500 and 150 spins — with a separate 200% up to €750 for sports. Two official sets of figures for the same offer is not a matter of taste but a communication error in the casino's own messaging. We calculated the review tables using the smaller, campaign-page version and listed the larger version on a separate row as presented.
Information on payments is the thinnest. Account currency is euro, average withdrawal time is listed as about 8 minutes 49 seconds and KYC verification is required before the first withdrawal. Everything else — the list of payment methods, deposit and withdrawal limits and fees — is missing from the public view. We did not invent a fictional cashier to replace the missing data, even though we could have listed the same cards and wallets as everyone else. The table therefore shows “not published” in several places, and that is a more honest answer than a polished list.
Scoring took place afterwards and always by the same formula: six areas, fixed weights, and player feedback taken directly from Trustpilot's own average. For Aureonplay the last point pulls the overall score down — 3.2/5 from one review carries a 15 percent weight even though the sample is statistically insignificant. We make no exception here because the rule is the same for all casinos on our list. Read a detailed description of the method on the page how we test.
We did not open a player account for this casino, did not deposit any euros and did not request a withdrawal. We therefore have no screenshots of the cashier, lobby or verification process, and we state that directly rather than present marketing images as proof of a visit. This limits the review clearly: everything we say about game selection, payment methods or withdrawal speeds is the casino's own statement, which we repeat with source notes.
In particular, an average withdrawal time under nine minutes is exactly that kind of claim. It’s the casino’s own marketing statement, which we neither confirm nor dispute — we have no measurement either way. If and when we buy a test for this brand, we will update this section and mark the date visibly. Until then, treat the figure with the same caution you’d give any advertising slogan.
Three views · self-shot, unedited
The images are ours, taken in a browser without an account, unedited and limited. The cashier view is not available: it opens only when logged in, and we do not create accounts for photography.
What the package actually says
The welcome offer is, according to the promotions page, 125% up to €1,000 plus 75 free spins. Minimum deposit is €20, wagering is 40× on both bonus and free spin wins, bonus bets are capped at €5 per spin and you have seven days to meet the wagering. Slots contribute 100% towards wagering. These figures are publicly available without logging in, and for that reason the casino gets 8.0 points from us for transparency of terms.
The benefit is part of a three-deposit package the casino claims can reach up to €10,000 and 550 free spins. This should be treated as a ceiling rather than a promise, because the campaign card doesn’t break down the percentages and caps for the second and third parts. A player therefore can’t calculate in advance how much they’d need to deposit across three deposits to reach the stated maximum. We recorded this omission in the table as its own row instead of inferring the missing parts ourselves.
Then there's the problem that has to be said out loud. The front page presents the same welcome offer with different figures than the campaign page: 225% up to €1 500 and 150 free spins for the casino side, or 200% up to €750 for sports betting. No wagering or other terms are given for this version. Two different figure sets for the same offer effectively mean you can't trust either without confirmation from the cashier. No bonus code is given in either place, so the offer appears to trigger on deposit.
After the first deposit there are ongoing perks aimed at regular players. Daily cashback returns up to 20% of losses, rakeback up to 11% per day, plus a VIP program, Invite & Earn referral program and lobby missions and collections. None of these have their calculation methods, wagering requirements or reward amounts disclosed publicly. Numerically there are many perks, but their true value can’t be assessed before logging in — that’s why the bonus subscore stays at 8,0 and doesn’t go higher.
Practical advice is dull but effective: calculate wagering in euros before you claim anything. A €1,000 bonus with a 40x playthrough means €40,000 of wagering volume in seven days at a €5 stake cap — that’s about 8,000 spins a week. If that doesn’t fit your play pattern, skip the offer and deposit without a bonus. A bonus is not a gift but a condition that restricts withdrawals until the task is done.
↔ The table scrolls horizontally.
| Benefit | Bonus | Free spins | Wagering | Terms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. deposit | 125% up to €1,000 | 75 | 40× | Min. €20 · max bet €5 · valid 7 days · slots only 100 % |
| The whole package (3 deposits) | According to the casino’s statement up to 10 000 € | up to 550 | partially unspecified | Percentages for parts 2 and 3 are not shown on the campaign card |
| Homepage alternative presentation | 225% up to 1 500 € (casino) or 200% up to 750 € (sports) | 150 | not released | Discrepancy with campaign page figures — confirm at the cashier |
| Daily cashback | up to 20 % of losses | — | not released | The calculation method isn't clear from the front page |
| Rakeback | up to 11 % per day | — | not released | Collection rules are not disclosed |
| Invite & Earn | Reward for a referred player | — | not released | The size of the reward is not stated |
No bonus code is specified. The figures on the front page and campaign page do not match — that alone is a reason to read the terms at the cashier before claiming.
We compiled the wagering multipliers, bet limits and validity periods of all casinos on our list into a single view on the page casino comparison, so 40× and seven days are put into context. Remember that the yellow button on this page is an advertisement and directs to a partner casino, not Aureonplay.
Five points that determine the value of the bonus
Aureonplay’s terms are published more completely than usual, so they can also be unpacked without guessing. We went through every figure and wrote here what they mean in a player’s everyday use — and what is missing from the terms.
Overall the terms are among the clearest on our list, and that is Aureonplay's strongest single merit. They are also strict: 40x wagering, a €5 cap and a one-week time limit together mean the offer is not suited to casual players. The discrepancy between the homepage and campaign page figures remains the only item we cannot resolve for you — it must be confirmed at the cashier.
Over 4,000 titles — casino’s own claim
The casino reports over 4,000 titles in its library. We emphasize the word reports: we have not counted the games ourselves nor seen a lobby counter, so the figure is presented in this review as the casino’s own claim rather than verified data. The selection reportedly covers slots, live dealer games, traditional table games and sports betting, and all of these operate under the same game account. The single-account model is convenient for users, but it also means bonus contribution percentages should be read carefully — the sports section has its own separate offer.
The backbone of the selection is slot games, and they are the ones that contribute fully to wager requirements. A typical lobby of this size is built from a combination of several studios and aggregators, so it contains both classic fruit machines and newer high-volatility video slots. We cannot confirm the exact breakdown because the lobby is not visible without logging in. If you want to compare games' payout percentages and max wins in advance, our from our slots page löytyvät samat luvut ilman kirjautumista.
Originals games are a category of their own. Aureonplay lists titles such as Chicken Road, Plinko 1000, Mines and Crash — fast-paced RNG-based games not found in the usual aggregator catalogue. In these types of games the player chooses the risk level and when to cash out, which makes them much more active play than automatic spins in a slot. The downside is the pace is quick and stakes add up fast, so set your personal loss limit before you start.
On the live side real dealers run tables in real time, and the casino states that blackjack, roulette and baccarat with variants are available on the table games front. Exact counts or table limits are not publicly disclosed. Note also that on international casinos the final selection can vary by country — what appears on the marketing page is not always the same as what your account sees after login. For this reason we gave the game library 8.5 points rather than a full nine.
Names are not disclosed before login
This is Aureonplay's clearest content gap. The casino does not name its partner studios on its homepage nor does it have a public provider page that can be read without an account. Partners are described in general terms as well-known industry houses, but no studio is named. In practice, a player cannot check before registering whether their favorites are in the selection — and that is a decisive question for many when choosing a casino.
The only named games are the casino’s own Originals titles: Chicken Road, Plinko 1000, Mines and Crash. They indicate the house has in-house game production or at least a white-label deal with a provider, but they don’t tell us anything about the rest of the library’s quality. A lobby of four thousand games can be made up just as well from dozens of known studios as from a few aggregators that hide hundreds of obscure titles. With the material available we cannot distinguish between these scenarios.
The practical tip is therefore: if games from a particular studio are a dealbreaker for you, check the provider filter right after opening your account and before your first deposit. If the selection doesn’t match your expectations, it’s best to leave the account unused until any money has been transferred. The same applies to game RTPs: a game with the same name often exists in multiple RTP versions, and the casino picks which version it places in its lobby.
Anjouan (Comoros) — number not published
Aureonplay operates under an Anjouan licence. Anjouan is a territory of the Comoros Islands that in recent years has become a cheap and fast option for operators. The licence indicates that activity is licensed, but the level of oversight and player protection is clearly lighter than, for example, Malta’s MGA licence or other EU regulation. In a dispute finding an impartial arbiter is more difficult and slower, and responsibility for resolving matters effectively falls to the player.
A more concrete problem is that the license number is not published on the site. The difference matters: with the number the license can in principle be checked in the issuer’s register; without it the license is only a mention. Some Anjouan casinos on our list publish their numbers, so this isn’t a regional practice but a choice by this brand. We marked this item as a negative in the quick facts, and it’s one reason the overall rating doesn’t go up.
Even less is said about ownership. The front page does not mention a parent company at all, and company details are directed only to the terms of use. The editorial brand list does not record an owner company for Aureonplay because none could be found in public sources — our entry for it is empty. Nor is a founding year given anywhere. However, the casino is verified in the editorial list as a genuine operating site and not merely a review page or clone.
There are three things to know about the domains. The main domain is aureonplay.com, we list aureonplaycasino.com as an alternate address, and the site is behind Cloudflare protection. However, some .nl addresses and addresses starting with aureon are gateway pages that are not the casino's actual service addresses but pages meant to redirect traffic. This is a common setup, but for the player it means one thing: check the address bar before you enter your credentials.
What has been released and what hasn't
Basic technical protection is in place as far as can be observed externally. The site runs behind Cloudflare, which protects against DDoS attacks and filters automated traffic — our own scans ran into this protection. It's a common solution and doesn't by itself speak to the casino's trustworthiness one way or the other. No detailed breakdown of encryption practices or security certificates is published on the site, so we make no claims about them.
The casino has made one public statement about the fairness of the games, and it was given in response to a Trustpilot review: according to the casino, the random number generator is independently certified and individual game outcomes cannot be adjusted. We have not seen the certificate or the testing lab’s name, so we record the claim as the brand’s own response. The house Originals games are RNG-based, meaning their outcomes are determined by the same principle as in slot games.
One thing is certain about verification: KYC checks are required before the first withdrawal. This is standard practice and is based on anti-money laundering and age verification. A practical tip is to submit documents right after opening the account rather than at withdrawal time — that way your cashout won’t be held up awaiting papers. The name and address must match the registration details, as even small discrepancies stop processing.
Account security is ultimately the player's responsibility. Use a strong password used only on this site, keep your email address up to date, and check settings to see if two-factor authentication can be enabled. Also keep receipts and chat transcripts — on a casino with a light license your own documentation is practically the only evidence you'll have in a dispute.
Euro account, but no public payment methods list
One clear plus right away: the account is denominated in euros. For a Finnish player that means there’s no currency conversion between your account and payment method, and no hidden fees from that. Many international casinos open accounts in dollars or cryptocurrency, meaning each transfer loses a bit en route. That problem doesn’t exist here, and it’s one reason the payments category scored 8.2 in our review.
After that the material ends abruptly. Aureonplay does not publish a list of payment methods to non-logged-in users, so we don't know which cards, online banks, wallets or possible cryptocurrencies are available. We also do not present such a list as a guess, even though it would be easy to compile from the industry's usual options. The table therefore says "not published" — that is the truthful content of this section.
The only public deposit figure on the whole site is the bonus minimum deposit of 20 €. Outside of that there are no stated mins, maxes, payment-method limits or possible fees. Fees are a particularly important gap here because a payment provider can charge its own transfer fee regardless of what the casino charges. So check both before your first transfer: the casino's cashier view and your payment method's terms.
The practical tip is simple. Choose a payment method that works both ways, i.e. the same channel for deposit and withdrawal. On most casinos winnings are returned primarily via the same route as the deposit, and if your chosen channel doesn’t support withdrawals you’ll have to add another method and wait for its verification. This is the most common reason the first withdrawal takes significantly longer than marketing promises.
Under-nine-minute promise — the casino’s own figure
Aureonplay’s most visible selling point is speed: the average withdrawal time is stated as about 8 minutes 49 seconds. The figure is exceptional by industry standards, and it’s clearly chosen as a marketing spearhead for that reason. We’ll say this plainly: this is the casino’s own marketing number. We did not perform a test withdrawal for this casino nor open an account, so we neither confirm nor dispute the figure — we simply do not have our own measurement.
A few things are still worth knowing when interpreting the figure. An average measured to the second typically refers to automated processing where approved withdrawals are forwarded without manual review. Such averages are usually calculated from successful and already-verified withdrawals and do not include requests stuck in KYC checks. In other words, your first withdrawal is unlikely to be the one that takes nine minutes.
Withdrawal limits are not published at all. We don't know the minimum withdrawal, daily or monthly caps, any win limits tied to bonuses or any fees. Withdrawal caps are precisely the detail that causes the most disputes at lightly regulated casinos, because they surprise the player only after a big win. Ask the limit in chat before you deposit, and save a screenshot of the answer.
KYC verification is required before the first withdrawal, and it's practically the only step you can influence. Upload a photo ID and proof of address sharp and well lit as soon as you open the account, and make sure the details match those you gave during registration. That way the speed promise can at least theoretically be fulfilled — an unverified account will not withdraw money in nine minutes at any casino.
Compare Aureonplay's stated average to the casinos on our list that publish both processing time and withdrawal caps — the differences are visible on the page casino comparison. The page's yellow button is an ad and directs to a partner casino.
Publicly available material — missing parts marked as missing
↔ The table scrolls horizontally.
| Section | What the source says | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Account currency | EUR — euro-denominated gaming account | Casino’s own statement |
| Method list | Not published to non-logged-in users | Homepage and cashier |
| Deposit limits | Not published — the only figure is the bonus' €20 minimum deposit | Bonus terms |
| Withdrawal time | The average reported is approx. 8 min 49 s | Casino’s own marketing figure |
| Withdrawal limits | Not published | — |
| Verification | KYC required before first withdrawal | Casino’s terms |
| Fees | Not published | — |
The under-nine-minute average is the casino’s own marketing figure, not our measurement. We haven’t made a test deposit at this casino, so we neither confirm nor dispute the number.
Live chat from the front page, no other channels stated
Live chat opens directly from the front page without logging in, and it is not hidden behind help pages. This is a small but meaningful detail: it means you can ask about withdrawal and bonus limits before opening an account. At a lightly licensed casino this option is a practical tool, since you can save the chat replies as proof of what was promised.
No other contact channels are disclosed. No email address, contact form, phone number or chat opening hours are published, and languages of support are not confirmed. The site language is English, and Finnish-language support has not been confirmed. Because of these gaps, we score customer support 7.5 out of 10: the channel exists and is easy to find, but there is no public information on its coverage.
If you contact support, make it easy for both sides. Provide your username, the transaction time and any error message in your first message, and attach a screenshot. For bonus and withdrawal issues, read the terms first and quote the exact clause you're asking about — that usually gets the correct answer in one go and prevents the conversation from stretching over multiple sessions.
1 review · average 3.2/5 · read 3.8.2026
Aureonplay’s Trustpilot profile exists, it has been claimed by the brand and was claimed in March 2026. The average is 3.2/5, but that is based on a single review. We’ll say this up front, which is the key sentence in this section: the sample is far too small for conclusions. One review tells you nothing about the casino’s payment behaviour, customer service quality or how bonus terms are applied, whether the review is positive or negative.
We therefore do not publish a review list for this casino at all. Our rule is that a flight (list) is shown only when there are more than five reviews — a list compiled from fewer would look like evidence even if it were mere randomness. Instead we quote the content of one existing review directly in this text and leave the conclusion undone.
The only review is dated 25.7.2026 and is a one-star review. Its author says they won and withdrew €500, after which subsequent deposits quickly burned away without significant wins. They therefore suspect the games were adjusted after the win. The casino replied publicly to the review, stating the RNG is independently certified and individual game outcomes cannot be altered. We present both sides because we cannot verify either.
Two points are still worth recording. First, the brand replied to a negative review within three days, which shows the profile is actively monitored — that's a better sign than a completely silent or neglected profile. Second, we couldn't find mirror profiles on Trustpilot for the same brand that could dilute negative feedback. In our scoring we use Trustpilot's average as-is, and 3.2 points with a 15% weight is the only reason the overall rating falls below eight.
Source: Trustpilot — aureonplay.com, read 3.8.2026. The average and number of reviews have been taken from the service as is.
It's best to set limits before the first spin
Standard casino tools include deposit, stake and loss limits, as well as session breaks and self-exclusion. Aureonplay does not publicly itemise its toolbox, so we don’t know which limits are available and how quickly they take effect. On casinos with a light license these obligations are looser than under EU regulation, which in practice means the responsibility for setting limits falls more on the player.
A practical rule is to set a euro limit and a time limit for yourself before your first deposit, not after. The 40x wagering requirement on the bonus and the one-week time limit create pressure to play more than intended, and that pressure is best resisted with a decision made in advance. If you find yourself chasing losses or hiding your play from loved ones, it’s no longer entertainment.
18+. Gambling is entertainment for adults and not a way to make money. In Finland free advice and chat support is available from Peluuri, peluuri.fi. We compiled instructions for setting limits and self-exclusion on the page responsible gambling.
8 questions with answers found in the sources
Because scores are calculated from six categories as a weighted average, and the license is not one of them separately. Aureonplay scores well for game selection, bonus transparency and payments, and Trustpilot’s 3.2 pulls the overall score down. A light license appears throughout the review as warnings, but the numeric score comes from measurable categories.
It means the operation is licensed, but oversight and player protection are lighter than, for example, under Malta's MGA license. In disputes finding an impartial arbitrator is harder. Aureonplay also doesn't publish its license number, so the permit cannot be checked in the register.
We do not know, and that is the whole problem. The campaign page says 125 % up to €1,000 and 75 free spins, the front page says 225 % up to €1,500 and 150 spins. We used the smaller value from the campaign page in our table and listed the larger one on a separate line. The applicable amount must be confirmed at the cashier before claiming.
With a €1,000 bonus that means a wagering requirement of €40,000, and with a €5 stake cap that’s about 8,000 spins. You have seven days. For a casual player this is practically impossible, so it’s best to skip the bonus unless you play almost daily.
It's the casino's own marketing figure, which we have not verified. We have not opened an account with this casino or made a test deposit, so we neither confirm nor dispute the number. Note also that the first withdrawal requires approved KYC verification, which is not included in such averages.
Aureonplay does not publish a list of payment methods to non-logged-in users, so we don’t know it and do not speculate. The only public figure is the bonus minimum deposit of €20. Account currency is euro, which removes currency conversion costs for Finnish players.
Practically nothing, because there is only one review. It is a 1-star review dated 25.7.2026 in which the player suspects game manipulation after a €500 withdrawal; the casino replied publicly that the RNG is independently certified. We do not publish a review list from such a small sample.
The site's language is English, and Finnish service has not been confirmed. The player account is, however, denominated in euros. Live chat opens directly from the front page, but its opening hours or service languages are not publicly stated.
Who this casino suits and who it doesn't
Aureonplay is our top-scoring brand, and the reason is narrow but real: it publishes its bonus terms as numbers. Wagering 40×, bet limit €5, validity 7 days and full slot contribution are readable without logging in, and that is rarer than it should be. Added to that are a large stated selection, the site’s own Originals games, an euro-denominated account and a live chat accessible from the front page. These are concrete things, not impressions.
As a counterbalance there is an equally concrete list of shortcomings. The licence is lightweight and its number isn't published, the owner isn't named on the front page, the founding year isn't given, studios aren't listed, payment methods and withdrawal limits aren't published, and the welcome offer figures in the casino's own texts contradict each other. The speed promise is the casino's own marketing figure without external verification, and there's only one Trustpilot review — also negative.
We recommend Aureonplay mainly for experienced players who read the terms themselves, ask about withdrawal limits in chat before depositing and size their stakes so that light regulation doesn't become an issue. If you require an EU licence, a public licence number or clear information about who runs the service, this is not your casino — in that case look at our other options. 7.4/10 is a good score in this comparison, but not a clean sheet.
All editorial reviews, scores and bonus terms are in the same table on the page casino comparison, so 7.4/10 sits in context alongside our other reviews. The page's yellow button is an advertisement and directs to a partner casino.
Review written by Petri Halkola, who has written slot and casino reviews for MedusaSlots from the start and is responsible for the scores on our list. Each review is built from the same framework with the same weights, and each figure is cited — the method is described in full on the page how we test. When we haven't seen something ourselves, we state that visibly instead of filling the gap with an industry average.
Three casinos whose reviews you can read from us
If the Anjouan licence is a dealbreaker for you, Kudosbet is the only option on our list with a Malta licence — the oversight and dispute resolution there are in a completely different league. The score falls only two tenths behind Aureonplay, so the trade-off is practically minor.Read the review.
Read the review
RCasino's welcome max is the highest on our list, so it appeals to higher-stakes players. Conversely, the overall score remains 6.5, meaning there is clearly more to fix in terms and transparency than with Aureonplay.Read the review.
Read the review
Betya publishes the limits of its bonuses most clearly on our list, which is exactly the feature that also earns Aureonplay points — without conflicting figures between the front page and the promotions page. Overall it still scores 6.0 in the other areas.Read the review.
Read the reviewAll editorial reviews with scores can be found on the page casino comparison — from there you can also see how the scores break down by category.
